Skip to main content
Submitted by admin on Wed, 05/30/2018 - 19:14
Preferred Design Procedure

 

Preferred Design Procedure

There are three different design approaches for compaction grouting:

  • Designs based on experience
  • Designs based on mathematical models
  • Designs based on numerical modeling

The first method is by far the most commonly used. Schaefer et al. (2016b) concludes that there is no way to accurately design a compaction grouting program using mathematical modeling. While there are some applicable models, they often are difficult to use and many input parameters often requiring assumptions to be made that can lead to further inaccuracy. Numerical modeling can be performed, but as with mathematical models it can be difficult to choose input parameters and ways to properly model the grout‑soil interaction.

 

The experienced based method is the preferred method and is often preferred in practice and recognized in the FHWA-NHI publication Schaefer et al (2016b). A lot of specialty contractors keep these design methods proprietary, but there is some published information on this design approach. Mathematical and numerical modeling may be used in addition to the experience based methods for critical projects requiring higher performance post-grouting.

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has a set of design documents for this technology. The documents are summarized below.

 

Publication Title
Publication Year
Publication Number
Available for Download
Ground Modification Methods
2016b
FHWA NHI-16-028
Yes1

 

  1. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi16028.pdf

Table 1 provides the typical inputs and outputs of the design and analysis procedures.

 

 

Table 1. Typical inputs and outputs for design and analysis procedures.

Performance Criteria/Indicators

Increase in SPT N-value
Increase in CPT tip/sleeve resistance
Heave at the ground surface
Decrease in volume grout takes
Peak pressure measurement
Increase in shear wave velocity


Subsurface Conditions

Delineation of Stratigraphy
Permeability/Hydraulic Conductivity
Liquefaction potential
SPT N-Values
CPT Tip Resistance and Sleeve Friction
Coefficient of consolidation
Presence of Voids
Relative Density
Gradation
Groundwater elevations


Loading Conditions

Embankment loading
Structural loading
Earthquake loading


Material Characteristics

Gradation of sand in the grout mix
Grout strength
Slump
Permeability of the grout mix
Internal friction


Construction Techniques

Grout pressure
Flow rate
Monitoring instruments & procedures


Geometry

Vertical or battered
Grid shape
Injection spacing


 

 

References

 

 

References

Al-Alusi, H.R. (1997). “Compaction Grouting: From Practice to Theory.” Geo-Logan 1997, GSP-66: Grouting: Compaction, Remediation, and Testing. http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/40516%28292%291

 

Basu, P., Madhav, M.R., and Prezzi, M. (2009). “Estimation of Heave Due to Inclined Compaction Grouting.” US-China Workshop on Ground Improvement Technologies, GSP-188: Advances in Ground Improvement, Research to Practice in the United States and China. http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/41025%28338%2925

Byle, M.J. (2000). “An Approach to the Design of LMD Grouting.” Geo-Denver 2000, GSP 104: Advances in Grouting and Ground Modification. http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/40516%28292%297

Schaefer, V.R., Berg, R.R., Collin, J.G., Christopher, B.R., DiMaggio, J.A., Filz, G.M., Bruce, D.A., and Ayala, D. (2016b). “Ground Modification Methods,” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, FHWA NHI-16-028 (Vol. II), 542p. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi16028.pdf

Schmertmann, J. H., and J. F. Henry. 1992. “A Design Theory for Compaction Grouting.” In Grouting Soil Improvement and Geosynthetics, edited by R. H. Borden. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No.30, pp. 215–228. Reston, VA: ASCE. http://cedb.asce.org/cgi/WWWdisplay.cgi?75054

Shuttle, D., and Jefferies, M. (2000). “Prediction and Validation of Compaction Grout Effectiveness.” Geo-Denver 2000, GSP-104: Advances in Grouting and Ground Modification. http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/40516%28292%294

Shuttle, D. and Jefferies, M. (1998), Dimensionless and unbiased CPT interpretation in sand. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 22: 351–391.

Warner, James (2004). Practical Handbook of Grouting - Soil, Rock and Structures. John Wiley & Sons.

 

Technology